From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:13:15 +0800
> Thanks for reply :) > I think I should use "udelay(100000/HZ)" instead, do you think it is > right? The delay is too long, please do not ignore that part of my critique of your change. You cannot delay so long under a lock, that's why the code is trying to use a sleeping delay. I'm not going to explain this problem another time.
