From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

Since uv_flush_tlb_others() implements flush_tlb_others() which is
about flushing user mappings, we should use __flush_tlb_single(),
which too is about flushing user mappings.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrew Banman <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: David Laight <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
 arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void bau_process_message(struct m
                local_flush_tlb();
                stat->d_alltlb++;
        } else {
-               __flush_tlb_one(msg->address);
+               __flush_tlb_single(msg->address);
                stat->d_onetlb++;
        }
        stat->d_requestee++;


Reply via email to