Hello Jarkko,
On 12/19/2017 01:59 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> James, Javier, thank you for sorting this out. I'll just have couple of
> minor comments on the patch.
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> + u32 vendor, intfcaps, intmask, clkrun_val;
>
> Could these split into four lines (one declaration per line)?
>
Yes, I didn't like that either but did this way for consistency with the driver.
>> u8 rid;
>> int rc, probe;
>> struct tpm_chip *chip;
>> @@ -772,6 +772,15 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct
>> tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>> ILB_REMAP_SIZE);
>> if (!priv->ilb_base_addr)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + clkrun_val = ioread32(priv->ilb_base_addr + LPC_CNTRL_OFFSET);
>> + /* Check if CLKRUN# is already not enabled in the LPC bus */
>
> /*
>
>> + if (!(clkrun_val & LPC_CLKRUN_EN)) {
>> + priv->flags |= TPM_TIS_CLK_ENABLE;
>
> Is the flag added just so surpress those WARN()'s?
>
I believe so. I just included here again for consistency, but I think the flag
and the warns can just go away.
> I've forgot why the WARN()'s even exist assuming that driver is
> functioning correctly.
>
> /Jarkko
>
If you agree with the patch, I can post it as a formal patch on a series that
do these cleanups as preparatory work. I've also noticed a NULL pointer deref
bug in an error path so I'll also fix that too.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat
