On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 8:32:09 PM CET Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:47:12AM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote: > >> Since the recent remote cpufreq callback work, its possible that a cpufreq > >> update is triggered from a remote CPU. For single policies however, the > >> current > >> code uses the local CPU when trying to determine if the remote sg_cpu > >> entered > >> idle or is busy. This is incorrect. To remedy this, compare with the nohz > >> tick > >> idle_calls counter of the remote CPU. > >> > >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com> > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > > Sweet!
OK, so any chance to get a Fixes: tag for the patch? Thanks, Rafael
