On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:14:45PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > I think that check is already gone for CFS in the current PeterZ tree. > It seems we use TICK_NS just for the reset of iowait_boost, isn't it?
Easy enough to bring back though. > However, if the remote updates of CFS works as expected, > the removal of the TICK_NS for CFS is not intentional? So I killed that because I now do get_util for all CPUs and figured get_util provides up-to-date numbers. So we don't need no artificial aging. Esp. once we get that whole blocked load stuff sorted.
