On Monday 14 May 2007 21:03, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > No, I'm proposing this for 2.6.22-rc1 ... Andi has already said he won't > > push the smp consolidation patch for 2.6.22. > > > > Without this patch, voyager won't even build, since the smp_ops broke > > it, so it needs to be fixed *now*. > > Sure, I suppose. But given that the patch which fixes this is a simple > no-functional-changes code-motion patch, it seems odd to not use it in > favour of putting in a big chunk of duplicated code.
Ok. If it's just the code movement patch that's needed perhaps it's better to use that. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
