On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:32:07 +0100 Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org> wrote:
> I've posted this as an RFC [1] and both Mike and Naoya seem to be OK > both with patches and the approach. I have rebased this on top of [2] > because there is a small conflict in mm/mempolicy.c. I know it is late > in the release cycle but similarly to [2] I would really like to see > this in linux-next for a longer time for a wider testing exposure. I'm interpreting this to mean "hold for 4.17-rc1"?
