* Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
> This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
> uprobe_events file. Instead of %p, use %px to display offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 40592e7b3568..268029ae1be6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static int probes_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>
> /* Don't print "0x (null)" when offset is 0 */
> if (tu->offset) {
> - seq_printf(m, "0x%p", (void *)tu->offset);
> + seq_printf(m, "0x%px", (void *)tu->offset);
> } else {
> switch (sizeof(void *)) {
> case 4:
Looks good to me. Did you consider %pK instead of %px?
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
