* Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
> + this_cpu_write(pti_disable,
> + next_p->mm && next_p->mm->context.pti_disable);
> +#endif
Another pet peeve, please write:
> + this_cpu_write(pti_disable, next_p->mm &&
> next_p->mm->context.pti_disable);
or consider introducing an 'mm_next' local variable, set to next_p->mm, and use
that to shorten the sequence.
More importantly, any strong reasons why the flag is logic-inverted? I.e. why
not
::pti_enabled?
Thanks,
Ingo
