On Sat, 19 May 2007 23:03:56 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean userspace irqbalance daemon? Yes. I mean userspace irqbalance daemon. Best Regards Komuro > Komuro wrote: > > [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces > > irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem. > > > > > > (The irq is not distributed to two Core > > ,most of the irq is distributed to CPU1) > > > > > > Mr. Thomas Gleixner, > > any idea to fix this problem? > > Do you mean userspace irqbalance daemon? > > It might need to be modified to work properly with a new and unusual > event source. > > Also, for some irq events, it may be good to send most interrupts to one > core/CPU. That enhances caching effects, among other benefits. Again, > this is highly dependent on the event source, I'm not saying that is the > case here. > > Regards, > > Jeff > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/