On Sun, 20 May 2007 09:09:16 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mr. Thomas Gleixner, > > any idea to fix this problem? > > Which problem ? The problem is CPU1 receives 38239 interrupt-16 but CPU0 receives only 15 interrupt-16 CPU0 should receive more interrupts. CPU0 CPU1 0: 85 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 0 698 IO-APIC-edge i8042 6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy 8: 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 12: 0 114 IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 369 2281 IO-APIC-edge ide0 15: 0 24 IO-APIC-edge ide1 16: 15 38239 IO-APIC-fasteoi yenta, pcnet_cs <<< problem 17: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi yenta NMI: 0 0 LOC: 50548 50547 ERR: 0 MIS: 15503 Best Regards Komuro > On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:14 +0900, Komuro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces > > irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem. > > it disables irq balancing for IRQ0, but this does not affect any other > interrupts. It is almost irrelevant as the PIT/HPET timer interrupt > (irq0) is disabled anyway and the local apic timer is used. > > > > CPU0 CPU1 > > > 0: 85 0 IO-APIC-edge timer > > There is no interrupt happening after bootup, so balancing is not a > problem here. > > > Mr. Thomas Gleixner, > > any idea to fix this problem? > > Which problem ? > > tglx > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/