On 2018-01-25 01:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 00:06 +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
The KCS (Keyboard Controller Style) interface is used to perform in-
band
IPMI communication between a server host and its BMC (BaseBoard
Management
Controllers).


+config ASPEED_KCS_IPMI_BMC
+       depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
+       depends on IPMI_KCS_BMC
+       select REGMAP_MMIO
+       tristate "Aspeed KCS IPMI BMC driver"
+       help
+         Provides a driver for the KCS (Keyboard Controller Style)
IPMI
+         interface found on Aspeed SOCs (AST2400 and AST2500).
+
+         The driver implements the BMC side of the KCS contorller,
it
+         provides the access of KCS IO space for BMC side.
+static inline u8 read_data(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc)
+{
+       return kcs_bmc->io_inputb(kcs_bmc, kcs_bmc->ioreg.idr);
+}
+
+static inline void write_data(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc, u8 data)
+{
+       kcs_bmc->io_outputb(kcs_bmc, kcs_bmc->ioreg.odr, data);
+}
+
+static inline u8 read_status(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc)
+{
+       return kcs_bmc->io_inputb(kcs_bmc, kcs_bmc->ioreg.str);
+}
+
+static inline void write_status(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc, u8 data)
+{
+       kcs_bmc->io_outputb(kcs_bmc, kcs_bmc->ioreg.str, data);
+}
+
+static void update_status_bits(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc, u8 mask, u8
val)
+{
+       u8 tmp;
+
+       tmp = read_status(kcs_bmc);
+
+       tmp &= ~mask;
+       tmp |= val & mask;
+
+       write_status(kcs_bmc, tmp);
+}
Shouldn't be above some kind of regmap API?
It is KCS spec defined IO access for hidden the low level, if the low level supports regmap, such as in kcs_bmc_aspeed.c,
aspeed_kcs_inb & aspeed_kcs_outb.

+/* Different phases of the KCS BMC module */
+enum kcs_phases {
+       /* BMC should not be expecting nor sending any data. */
+       KCS_PHASE_IDLE,
Perhaps kernel-doc?
Code + inline comments should be better than kernel-doc ? Or move it out like :

/* The interface for checksum offload between the stack and networking drivers
 * is as follows...
 *
 * A. IP checksum related features
 *
 * Drivers advertise checksum offload capabilities in the features of a device.  * From the stack's point of view these are capabilities offered by the driver,  * a driver typically only advertises features that it is capable of offloading
 * to its device.
 *
 * The checksum related features are:
 *
 *    NETIF_F_HW_CSUM    - The driver (or its device) is able to compute one
 *              IP (one's complement) checksum for any combination
 *              of protocols or protocol layering. The checksum is
 *              computed and set in a packet per the CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
 *              interface (see below).
 *
 *    NETIF_F_IP_CSUM - Driver (device) is only able to checksum plain
 *              TCP or UDP packets over IPv4. These are specifically
 *              unencapsulated packets of the form IPv4|TCP or
 *              IPv4|UDP where the Protocol field in the IPv4 header
 *              is TCP or UDP. The IPv4 header may contain IP options
 *              This feature cannot be set in features for a device
 *              with NETIF_F_HW_CSUM also set. This feature is being
 *              DEPRECATED (see below).
+};

+/* IPMI 2.0 - 9.5, KCS Interface Registers */
+struct kcs_ioreg {
+       u32 idr; /* Input Data Register */
+       u32 odr; /* Output Data Register */
+       u32 str; /* Status Register */
kernel-doc
+};
+
+static inline void *kcs_bmc_priv(const struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc)
+{
+       return kcs_bmc->priv;
+}
+
+extern int kcs_bmc_handle_event(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc);
+extern struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc_alloc(struct device *dev, int
sizeof_priv,
+                                       u32 channel);
Drop extern.
After dropping extern, it truly passed compilation, have any special reason to drop 'extern' ?
I saw in kernel still use extern like : extern void printk_nmi_init(void);
+#endif
Next one could be reviewed when you split this patch to two.
Got it!

Reply via email to