On 01/25, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-pins.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-pins.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b97f99e6f4b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-pins.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +&tlmm {

I'm not the maintainer, but I find this approach to the pins
really annoying. I have to flip to another file to figure out how
a board has configured the pins. And we may bring in a bunch of
settings that we don't ever use on some board too. Why can't we
put the settings in the board file directly?

> +     qup_uart2_default: qup_uart2_default {
> +             pinmux {
> +                     function = "qup9";
> +                     pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> +             };
> +
> +             pinconf {
> +                     pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> +                     drive-strength = <2>;
> +                     bias-disable;
> +             };
> +     };
> +
> +     qup_uart2_sleep: qup_uart2_sleep {
> +             pinmux {
> +                     function = "gpio";
> +                     pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> +             };
> +
> +             pinconf {
> +                     pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> +                     drive-strength = <2>;
> +                     bias-disable;
> +             };
> +     };
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index a21f4912b3e2..529f4ba3a1db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h>
>  
>  / {
>       model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845";

I'd expect some sort of serial alias node stuff here too.

> @@ -304,5 +305,26 @@
>                       cell-index = <0>;
>               };
>  
> +             qup_1: qcom,geni_se@ac0000 {
> +                     compatible = "qcom,geni-se-qup";
> +                     reg = <0xac0000 0x6000>;
> +             };
> +
> +             qup_uart2: serial@a84000 {
> +                     compatible = "qcom,geni-console", "qcom,geni-uart";
> +                     reg = <0xa84000 0x4000>;
> +                     reg-names = "se_phys";
> +                     clock-names = "se-clk", "m-ahb", "s-ahb";
> +                     clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP1_S1_CLK>,
> +                              <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP_1_M_AHB_CLK>,
> +                              <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP_1_S_AHB_CLK>;
> +                     pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> +                     pinctrl-0 = <&qup_uart2_default>;
> +                     pinctrl-1 = <&qup_uart2_sleep>;
> +                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 354 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> +                     qcom,wrapper-core = <&qup_1>;

Is this binding still being reviewed? Ugly.

> +                     status = "disabled";
> +             };
>       };
>  };
> +#include "sdm845-pins.dtsi"

Why at the bottom?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to