On 05-02-18, 09:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > By design (which I admit may be confusing) it should be fine to call > dpm_resume_end() after a failing dpm_suspend_start(), whatever the reason > for the failure is. cpufreq_suspend/resume() don't take that into account, > everybody else does.
Hmm, I see. Can't do much then, just fix the only broken piece of code :) -- viresh
