On 2/13/2018 10:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/02/2018 23:58, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> +bool kvm_valid_msr_feature(u32 msr, u64 data)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < num_msr_based_features; i++) {
>> +            struct kvm_msr_based_features *m = msr_based_features + i;
>> +
>> +            if (msr != m->msr)
>> +                    continue;
>> +
>> +            /* Make sure not trying to change unsupported bits */
>> +            return (data & ~m->mask) ? false : true;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return false;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_valid_msr_feature);
>> +
> 
> This is probably unnecessary too (the allowed values are a bit more
> complicated for, you just guessed it, VMX capability MSRs) and you can
> just check bits other than LFENCE in svm_set_msr.

The whole routine or just the bit checking?  I can see still needing the
check to be sure the "feature" is present.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Paolo
> 

Reply via email to