Em Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 02:08:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 02:03:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 01:56:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 01:52:45PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > escreveu: > > > > Em Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:04:15PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu: > > > > > Will be used for generating the syscall id/string translation table. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 399 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > tools/perf/check-headers.sh | 1 + > > > > > 2 files changed, 400 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h > > > > > > > > Not building on a cross-compiling environment (ubuntu 16.04), I'm > > > > checking... > > > > > > BTW, details about that environment: > > > > > > 46 29.83 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc : FAIL powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc > > > (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609 > > > > So, you did it just for ppc64? Because... > > > > 46 29.83 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc : FAIL powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc > > (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609 > > 47 69.81 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64 : Ok powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc > > (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.1) 5.4.0 20160609 > > 48 68.35 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok > > powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609 > > > > Its just on ppc32 that his is falling apart. > > So, $(SRCARCH) maps to both powerpc and powerpc64m which will set > NO_SYSCALL_TABLE to zero, thus linking against > tools/perf/util/syscalltbl.o, which will include the generated > syscalls_64.c only for ppc64, b00m.
Ok, so after looking at: commit eef289f79c03ba5ca197e2ac1e33906175f01c39 Author: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> Date: Mon Oct 10 22:56:11 2005 +1000 powerpc: Merge asm/unistd.h Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> ---- Humm, we need to create two tables, one for 32-bit and another for 64, even with ppc not having (AFAIK) clashes in syscall numbers for 32/64... Trying to do it now. - Arnaldo