On 2018-02-16 12:31:09 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:53:03 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > As for the second invocation (tasklet_action_common() part) is always > > invoked in BH-disabled context (even if called from ksoftirqd) so you > > are never preemptible() and can't switch CPUs. > > So I am going to correct this patch as you suggested but I don't see the > > reason to do the same in the second one. > > Should we add something like: > > WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_atomic()); > > ?
Doubt it. this_cpu_ptr() screams already with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT. > -- Steve Sebastian
