On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:26:35AM +0530, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > On 03/01/2018 02:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 02:18:27PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > In tpm_transmit, after send(), the code checks for status in a loop > > Maybe cutting hairs now but please just use the actual function name > > instead of send(). Just makes the commit log more useful asset. > Sure, will do. > > > > > - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT); > > > + tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL); > > What about just calling schedule()? > I'm not sure what you mean by "schedule()". Are you suggesting instead of > using usleep_range(), using something with an even finer grain construct? > > Thanks & Regards, > - Nayna
kernel/sched/core.c /Jarkko
