Em Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:58:49AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > We end up leaking entries when what I'm suggesting you to do is to > not clobber entries with the return of realloc() (doing it this way most > of the time leads to bugs), but instead store it to a temp var > (nentries), and if it succeeds, then you know that you can > set nentries to entries and go ahead with your nicely shrunk block of > memory. > If it fails, then you continue with the original block of memory, that > continues to have what you just set up, etc. > Lemme look a third time to your original patch, I must be missing > something...
I don't think I'm missing anything ;-) - Arnaldo
