OK, guys, I think I've got it: static int ext2_update_inode(struct inode * inode, int do_sync) { ... mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bh, inode); ... } Yes, that's right. bh of piece of inode table is put on inode's list. Fix: in ext2/inode.c 1211s/mark_buffer_dirty_inode/mark_buffer_dirty/ HTH, Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- test12-pre4 Linus Torvalds
- Re: test12-pre4 Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: test12-pre4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: test12-pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: test12-pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: test12-pre4 Nikhil Goel
- [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4 Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty block... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty b... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty b... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty block... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre... Andrew Morton