Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks

[Andrew Morton]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> 
>         OK, guys, I think I've got it:

Yes, you have.

Two machines, four hours, zero failures.

This is with

        - test12-pre4
        - aviro bforget patch 
        - UnlockPage() removed from vmscan.c:623
        - and


--- linux-2.4.0-test12-pre4/fs/ext2/inode.c     Mon Dec  4 21:07:12 2000
+++ linux-akpm/fs/ext2/inode.c  Tue Dec  5 08:46:38 2000
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
                raw_inode->i_block[0] = cpu_to_le32(kdev_t_to_nr(inode->i_rdev));
        else for (block = 0; block < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; block++)
                raw_inode->i_block[block] = inode->u.ext2_i.i_data[block];
-       mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bh, inode);
+       mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
        if (do_sync) {
                ll_rw_block (WRITE, 1, &bh);
                wait_on_buffer (bh);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/