On 16-03-18, 09:38, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > As we move from no clients/consumers in kernel voting on corners, > to *some* voting and some not voting, we might end up in a situation > where the clients which remove votes can adversly impact others > who still don't have a way to vote. > > To avoid this situation, have a max vote on all corners at init. > This should/can be removed once we have all clients moved to > be able to vote/unvote for themselves. > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c > index 4058c5b450c6..ebdcf9398441 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c > @@ -304,6 +304,15 @@ static int rpmpd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pm_genpd_init(&rpmpds[i]->pd, NULL, true); > > data->domains[i] = &rpmpds[i]->pd; > + > + /* > + * Until we have all consumers voting on corners > + * just vote the max corner on all PDs > + * This should ideally be *removed* once we have > + * all (most) consumers being able to vote > + */ > + rpmpd_set_performance(&rpmpds[i]->pd, MAX_RPMPD_STATE); > + rpmpd_power_on(&rpmpds[i]->pd); > } > > return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(pdev->dev.of_node, data);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh
