On 19/03/2018 08:31, Kang, Luwei wrote:
>>> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST) {
>> This would be vmx_pt_supported(), but I think it's better to remove that
>> function and just test pt_mode ==
>> PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST everywhere (or !=).
> Hi Paolo,
> There have so many vmx_pt_supported() invoked in MSRs read/write (patch
> 9) patch and I think it can be replaced by pt_mode check.
> But I think this function need to be reserved in patch 5(cpuid
> emulation). What is your opinion?
Yes, the function pointer needs to stay.
Paolo
