On 03/14/2018 10:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0900, YOUNGKEUN OH wrote:
>> Cleanup checkpatch error:
>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YOUNGKEUN OH <y.k...@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> index 3f2f8c1..da9bddb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> @@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ static int __init s3c24xx_serial_console_init(void)
>>  }
>>  console_initcall(s3c24xx_serial_console_init);
>>
>> -#define S3C24XX_SERIAL_CONSOLE &s3c24xx_serial_console
>> +#define S3C24XX_SERIAL_CONSOLE (&s3c24xx_serial_console)
> 
> That's not a complex macro!
> 
> Please use checkpatch as a hint, not the "truth".
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
Dear Greg.

Yes! Of course that's not a pretty complex macro. However, I think it is
important to make a small effort to modify the minimum standard,
Checkpatch ERROR, to ensure consistency in the Linux code.
Starting with this Checkpatch error of samsung.c, I would like to start
my efforts on contribution from a small point.  Please review it again.
If there are any points that require modification, such as comment,
then I'll modify it.
Thank you.

Best regards,
Youngkeun Oh

Reply via email to