On 03/22/2018 07:23 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Also, you don't allocate chip->valid_mask anywhere.
So I see now where it's allocated, but something is fishy. I have three
TLMMs on my chip:
[ 67.107018] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:351 gpiochip->need_valid_mask=1
[ 67.153747] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:356 gpiochip->ngpio=72
[ 67.195324] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:361
gpiochip->valid_mask=0000000070b1a4b6
[ 68.532992] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:356 gpiochip->ngpio=44
[ 68.574496] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:361
gpiochip->valid_mask=000000002f33b8a3
[ 68.709378] msm_gpio_init_valid_mask:837 ret=44 max_gpios=44
chip->valid_mask=000000002f33b8a3
[ 69.726502] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:351 gpiochip->need_valid_mask=1
[ 69.772960] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:356 gpiochip->ngpio=54
[ 69.814084] gpiochip_init_valid_mask:361
gpiochip->valid_mask=000000001a53c932
Are these normal addresses for kcalloc() to return? They're not even
word-aligned.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
