On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 19:59 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 03/22/2018 07:23 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > > > > Also, you don't allocate chip->valid_mask anywhere. > > So I see now where it's allocated, but something is fishy.
No, it seems you missed %p vs. %px discussion. The pointers printed by %p nowadays are hashed values, not the original ones. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
