On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:14 -0400
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from
> > Signed-off-by:
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > +
> > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling
> > of a
> > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they
> > can
> > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
> >
> > Acked-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What, no Tested-by: ?
Heh. Indeed. I think there's room for both fwiw.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
