On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:20 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> If flag PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO is set, also having any
> PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_* bit set is invalid.
> 
> This sanity check is done in pci_epc_set_bar(), so that we don't need
> to do this sanity check in all epc->ops->set_bar() implementations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c 
> b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> index 109d75f0b7d2..40eea20d21f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> @@ -309,10 +309,13 @@ int pci_epc_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>  {
>       int ret;
>       unsigned long irq_flags;
> +     int flags = epf_bar->flags;
>  
>       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
>           (epf_bar->barno == BAR_5 &&
> -          epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))
> +          flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ||
> +         (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO &&
> +          flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK))
>               return -EINVAL;

If possible I'd like this to be split. But otherwise

Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
>  
>       if (!epc->ops->set_bar)
> 

Reply via email to