On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:06:48PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> This is a cosmetic patch that deals with the address filter structure's
> ambiguous fields 'filter' and 'range'. The former stands to mean that the
> filter's *action* should be to filter the traces to its address range if
> it's set or stop tracing if it's unset. This is confusing and hard on the
> eyes, so this patch replaces it with 'action' enum. The 'range' field is
> completely redundant (meaning that the filter is an address range as
> opposed to a single address trigger), as we can use zero size to mean the
> same thing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>

Ingo, can you merge this?

Reply via email to