* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:06:48PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > This is a cosmetic patch that deals with the address filter structure's
> > ambiguous fields 'filter' and 'range'. The former stands to mean that the
> > filter's *action* should be to filter the traces to its address range if
> > it's set or stop tracing if it's unset. This is confusing and hard on the
> > eyes, so this patch replaces it with 'action' enum. The 'range' field is
> > completely redundant (meaning that the filter is an address range as
> > opposed to a single address trigger), as we can use zero size to mean the
> > same thing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
>
> Ingo, can you merge this?
Sure, will do!
Thanks,
Ingo
