On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:52:33PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Andrea Parri <andrea.pa...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > It's more complicated than that. This function is dangerous and should be > > > used with extreme care. In the case where CONFIG_SMP=n the value is > > > locked > > > one way or the other and it might be the wrong way. > > > > You mean "unlocked"? (aka, return 0) > > No, I mean "fixed", sorry. We've had problems stemming from this before on UP > systems.
Sorry, but I don't understand your objection: are you suggesting to add something like "Always return 0 on !SMP" to the comment? what else? Andrea > > David
