On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 09:15:39AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Mon, 02 Apr 2018, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > > The case for the rt task throttling (which this workload also hits) can be > > ignored in > > that the skip_update call is actually bogus and quite the contrary (the > > request bits > > are removed/reverted). > > While at it, how about this trivial patch? > > ----8<-------------------------------------------------------- > [PATCH 2/1] sched: Simplify helpers for rq clock update skip requests > > By renaming the functions we can get rid of the skip parameter > and have better code redability. It makes zero sense to have > things such as: > > rq_clock_skip_update(rq, false) > > When the skip request is in fact not going to happen. Ever. Rename > things such that we end up with: > > rq_clock_skip_update(rq) > rq_clock_cancel_skipupdate(rq) > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbu...@suse.de>
Works for me :-) Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
