On Fri 06-04-18 01:03:24, Greg Thelen wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index d4d04fee568a..d51bae5a53e2 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -746,10 +746,11 @@ int inode_congested(struct inode *inode, int cong_bits)
>       if (inode && inode_to_wb_is_valid(inode)) {
>               struct bdi_writeback *wb;
>               bool locked, congested;
> +             unsigned long flags;
>  
> -             wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &locked);
> +             wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &locked, &flags);

Wouldn't it be better to have a cookie (struct) rather than 2 parameters
and let unlocked_inode_to_wb_end DTRT?

>               congested = wb_congested(wb, cong_bits);
> -             unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, locked);
> +             unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, locked, flags);
>               return congested;
>       }
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to