On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 10:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Move the non-trivial code from the long pointer() function. We are > going > to add a check for the access to the address that will make it even > more > complicated. > > Also it is better to warn about unknown specifier instead of falling > back to the %p behavior. It will help people to understand what is > going wrong. They expect the IP address and not a pointer anyway > in this situation.
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Unsupported pointer format specifier: > %%p%c%c\n", > + fmt[0], fmt[1]); > I think WARN is too much here. pr_warn_once() ? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
