On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:59:33 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI this happens in mainline kernel 4.17.0-rc1.
> It looks like a new regression.
>
> It occurs in 4 out of 4 boots.
>
> [ 12.345562] Write protecting the kernel text: 14376k
> [ 12.346649] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 4740k
> [ 12.347584] rodata_test: all tests were successful
> [ 12.348499] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 12.349193] attempted to set unsupported pgprot: 8000000000000025 bits:
> 8000000000000000 supported: 7fffffffffffffff
> [ 12.350792] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:540
> handle_mm_fault+0xfc1/0xfe0:
> check_pgprot at
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:535
> (inlined by) pfn_pte at
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:549
> (inlined by) do_anonymous_page
> at mm/memory.c:3169
> (inlined by) handle_pte_fault
> at mm/memory.c:3961
> (inlined by) __handle_mm_fault
> at mm/memory.c:4087
> (inlined by) handle_mm_fault
> at mm/memory.c:4124
> [ 12.352294] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1 #172
> [ 12.353357] EIP: handle_mm_fault+0xfc1/0xfe0:
> check_pgprot at
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:535
> (inlined by) pfn_pte at
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:549
> (inlined by) do_anonymous_page
> at mm/memory.c:3169
> (inlined by) handle_pte_fault
> at mm/memory.c:3961
> (inlined by) __handle_mm_fault
> at mm/memory.c:4087
> (inlined by) handle_mm_fault
> at mm/memory.c:4124
Dave, fb43d6cb91ef57 ("x86/mm: Do not auto-massage page protections")
looks like a culprit?
