On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:47:02PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> rhashtable_walk_prev() returns the object returned by
>> the previous rhashtable_walk_next(), providing it is still in the
>> table (or was during this grace period).
>> This works even if rhashtable_walk_stop() and rhashtable_talk_start()
>> have been called since the last rhashtable_walk_next().
>> 
>> If there have been no calls to rhashtable_walk_next(), or if the
>> object is gone from the table, then NULL is returned.
>> 
>> This can usefully be used in a seq_file ->start() function.
>> If the pos is the same as was returned by the last ->next() call,
>> then rhashtable_walk_prev() can be used to re-establish the
>> current location in the table.  If it returns NULL, then
>> rhashtable_walk_next() should be used.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
>
> Can you explain the need for this function and its difference
> from the existing rhashtable_walk_peek?

The need is essentially the same as the need for
rhashtable_walk_peek().  The difference is that the actual behaviour can
be documented briefly (and so understood easily) without enumerating
multiple special cases.
rhashtable_walk_peek() is much the same as
 rhashtable_walk_prev() ?: rhashtable_walk_next()

The need arises when you need to "stop" a walk and then restart at the
same object, not the next one. i.e. the last object returned before the
"stop" wasn't acted on.
This happens with seq_file if the buffer space for ->show() is not
sufficient to format an object.  In the case, seq_file will stop() the
iteration, make more space available (either by flushing or by
reallocing) and will start again at the same location.
If the seq_file client stored the rhashtable_iter in the seq_file
private data, it can use rhasthable_walk_prev() to recover its position
if that object is still in the hash table.  If it isn't still present,
rhashtable_walk_next() can be used to get the next one.  In some cases
it can be useful for the client to know whether it got the previous one
or not.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to