Re: [RFC] perf/core: what is exclude_idle supposed to do

[Vince Weaver]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:

> > AFAICT it works on Power and possibly ARM.
> 
> at least some ARMs are a bit more honest about it than x86
> 
> ivybridge:
>       Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls':
>       1,368,162      instructions
>       1,368,162      instructions:I
> 
> pi2/ARM cortex-A7
>       Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls':
>       1,910,083      instructions
>       <not supported>      instructions:I
> 
> I'd fire up my Power8 machine to see but not sure it's worth the hassle 
> and/or having to get out the ear protection.

I did power up the Power8 machine in the end:

power8:
        perf stat -e cycles,cycles:I sleep 5
        Performance counter stats for 'sleep 5':
        14,271,273      cycles
        14,271,273      cycles:I

???

But then if I try again on power8

        perf stat -a -e cycles,cycles:I sleep 5
         Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
        1,238,772,322,327      cycles
        1,238,674,771,713      cycles:I   

there is a difference.

But then on ivybridge

        perf stat -a -e cycles,cycles:I sleep 5
        Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
        589,598,104      cycles
        589,537,190      cycles:I

there is also a different in system wide mode.

So maybe exclude_idle does do something on x86?  Or am I completely 
misunderstanding what the flag is supposed to be indicating?

Vince