Hi! On Fri 2018-03-09 13:15:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If you want to be taken seriously then I think minimum you also need to > > - Give a GPG key for messages to the list > > Oh, I don't want to be taken seriously by people who use gpg > encrypted email.
Heh. I see that gpg has some usability problems, but we do encrypt our
http connections, and email is at least as sensitive.
> > - State what security is in place (encryption etc) to protect the list
> > itself
>
> That could be stated, but it's worth noting the other rules.
>
> If you have some long corrupt vendor disclosure period and are worried
> about any good guys finding out (the bad guys probably already have
> it), we're not the list for you anyway.
>
> Keep your "we'll keep security problems under wraps so that they can
> be exploited for a long time" emails to yourself, or send them to
> /dev/null.
Umm, they will not sent it to /dev/null, as that is not encrypted :-).
I guess I can act as this kind of /dev/null. It might be useful to
note the issues, and for the serious ones notify you few days before
the "long" embargo is going to expire...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
