* Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote:
> @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static void reuse_unused_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap)
> op = container_of(ap, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
> if (unlikely(list_empty(&op->list)))
> printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: found a stray unused "
> - "aggrprobe@%p\n", ap->addr);
> + "aggrprobe@%pS\n", ap->addr);
Is this a kernel bug? If yes then please convert this to a WARN_ON_ONCE() that
doesn't print any kernel addresses.
> /* Enable the probe again */
> ap->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> /* Optimize it again (remove from op->list) */
> @@ -985,7 +985,8 @@ static int arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(&kprobe_ftrace_ops,
> (unsigned long)p->addr, 0, 0);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_debug("Failed to arm kprobe-ftrace at %p (%d)\n", p->addr,
> ret);
> + pr_debug("Failed to arm kprobe-ftrace at %pS (%d)\n",
> + p->addr, ret);
> return ret;
Can this happen during normal use? If yes then just remove the warning message.
> }
>
> @@ -1025,7 +1026,8 @@ static int disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
>
> ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(&kprobe_ftrace_ops,
> (unsigned long)p->addr, 1, 0);
> - WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at %p (%d)\n", p->addr,
> ret);
> + WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at %pS (%d)\n",
> + p->addr, ret);
As this is a signal of a kernel bug, just convert this to a regular WARN_ONCE()
that doesn't print any kernel addresses.
> +/* Caller must NOT call this in usual path. This is only for critical case */
> void dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Dumping kprobe:\n");
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Name: %s\nAddress: %p\nOffset: %x\n",
> - kp->symbol_name, kp->addr, kp->offset);
> + pr_err("Dumping kprobe:\n");
> + pr_err("Name: %s\nOffset: %x\nAddress: %pS\n",
> + kp->symbol_name, kp->offset, kp->addr);
No, this function should just go away and be replaced by a WARN() in
reenter_kprobe().
Thanks,
Ingo
