On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:35:49AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > The flow diagram should be inside a code-block to avoid those > warnings: > ./include/linux/wait.h:110: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank > line; unexpected unindent. > ./include/linux/wait.h:113: WARNING: Unexpected indentation. > ./include/linux/wait.h:115: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank > line; unexpected unindent. > > This is easily done by using "::" instead of just ":".
And I'll voice my objection once again. This makes a regular comment worse. This rst stuff is utter shit for making normal text files less readable in your favourite text editor. If this gets merged, I'll simply remove that spurious ':' the next time I'm near that comment. > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+sams...@kernel.org> > --- > include/linux/wait.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h > index d9f131ecf708..d907ed761a7f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/wait.h > +++ b/include/linux/wait.h > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ init_waitqueue_func_entry(struct wait_queue_entry > *wq_entry, wait_queue_func_t f > * lead to sporadic and non-obvious failure. > * > * Use either while holding wait_queue_head::lock or when used for wakeups > - * with an extra smp_mb() like: > + * with an extra smp_mb() like:: > * > * CPU0 - waker CPU1 - waiter > * > -- > 2.17.0 >
