Hi Boris,

I've sent v5 of the patch based on your comment.

Thanks.
Jane

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 7:19 AM
> To: Wan, Jane (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; Bos, Ties (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mtd: rawnand: use bit-wise majority to recover the
> contents of ONFI parameter
> 
> On Tue,  8 May 2018 14:19:54 -0700
> Jane Wan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Per ONFI specification (Rev. 4.0), if all parameter pages have invalid
> > CRC values, the bit-wise majority may be used to recover the contents
> > of the parameter pages from the parameter page copies present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jane Wan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c |   49
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > index 72f3a89..dfc341c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > @@ -5086,6 +5086,38 @@ static int
> nand_flash_detect_ext_param_page(struct nand_chip *chip,
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +#define GET_BIT(bit, val)   (((val) >> (bit)) & 0x01)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Recover NAND parameter page with bit-wise majority  */ static int
> > +onfi_recover_param(struct nand_onfi_params *p, int pages)
> 
> I had something more generic in mind:
> 
> static void nand_bit_wise_majority(const void **srcbufs,
>                                  void *dstbuf,
>                                  unsigned int nbufs,
>                                  unsigned int bufsize)
> {
>       ...
> }
> 
> And then you do the crc check in nand_flash_detect_onfi().
> 
> The reason I'm asking that is because I'm almost sure we'll re-use this 
> functions
> for extended param pages, and also for vendor specific data (we already have a
> byte-wise majority check in the hynix driver, so I wouldn't be surprised if 
> other
> vendors decided to use a bit-wise approach for some of their OTP area).

[Jane] Modified the function as suggested in v5.

> 
> > +{
> > +   int i, j, k;
> > +   u8 v, m;
> > +   u8 *buf;
> > +
> > +   buf = (u8 *)p;
> > +   for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*p); i++) {
> > +           v = 0;
> > +           for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
> > +                   m = 0;
> > +                   for (k = 0; k < pages; k++)
> > +                           m += GET_BIT(j, buf[k*sizeof(*p) + i]);
> > +                   if (m > pages/2)
> > +                           v |= BIT(j);
> > +           }
> > +           ((u8 *)p)[i] = v;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)p, 254) ==
> > +                   le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) {
> > +           return 1;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Check if the NAND chip is ONFI compliant, returns 1 if it is, 0 
> > otherwise.
> >   */
> > @@ -5102,7 +5134,7 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct nand_chip
> *chip)
> >             return 0;
> >
> >     /* ONFI chip: allocate a buffer to hold its parameter page */
> > -   p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +   p = kzalloc((sizeof(*p) * 3), GFP_KERNEL);
> >     if (!p)
> >             return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > @@ -5113,21 +5145,28 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct
> nand_chip *chip)
> >     }
> >
> >     for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > -           ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, sizeof(*p), true);
> > +           ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, &p[i], sizeof(*p), true);
> >             if (ret) {
> >                     ret = 0;
> >                     goto free_onfi_param_page;
> >             }
> >
> > -           if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (uint8_t *)p, 254) ==
> > +           if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)&p[i], 254) ==
> >                             le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) {
> > +                   if (i)
> > +                           memcpy(p, &p[i], sizeof(*p));
> >                     break;
> >             }
> >     }
> >
> >     if (i == 3) {
> > -           pr_err("Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting\n");
> > -           goto free_onfi_param_page;
> > +           pr_err("Could not find valid ONFI parameter page\n");
> > +           pr_info("Recover ONFI params with bit-wise majority\n");
> > +           ret = onfi_recover_param(p, 3);
> > +           if (ret == 0) {
> > +                   pr_err("ONFI parameter recovery failed, aborting\n");
> > +                   goto free_onfi_param_page;
> > +           }
> >     }
> >
> >     /* Check version */

Reply via email to