On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:25:18PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently, there is no read barrier between reading the index
> > (kfifo.in) and fetching the real data from the fifo.
> >
> > I am afraid that will cause the vfifo is observed as not empty
> > however the data is not actually ready for read. Right?
>
> That code is decidedly dodgy indeed. I can only see smp_wmb() but no
> matching barriers at all -- therefore the code is almost certainly as
> good as not having any barriers at all.
>
> I would suggest you try and convert the code to smp_store_release() and
> smp_load_acquire() while you're at it.
Isn't this one of the places where we rely on control dependencies?
Thanx, Paul
