Remove checking of the CPU number for consistency as it won't ever fail
unless there is a severe bug in the cpufreq core.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c 
b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
index 61f00d1cba26..147ae3e14f18 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
        { .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
 };
 
-#define NUM_CPUS       2
-
 static struct clk *cpu_clk;
 static struct clk *pll_x_clk;
 static struct clk *pll_p_clk;
@@ -119,9 +117,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
        int ret;
 
-       if (policy->cpu >= NUM_CPUS)
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk);
 
        /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
-- 
2.17.0

Reply via email to