On 18.05.2018 05:07, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17-05-18, 21:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> -static int __init tegra_cpufreq_init(void) >> +static int tegra20_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> + struct tegra20_cpufreq_data *data; >> int err; >> >> - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra20")) >> - return -ENODEV; > > So this stuff wasn't really required as you are getting rid of that in > the same series. Should we really add it then ? Maybe .. >
It's not strictly needed, but I'd prefer to keep that stuff for clarity as it kinda shows the way that led to the final result. [snip]