On 18.05.2018 12:07, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:00:55PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Currently tegra20-cpufreq kernel module isn't getting autoloaded because
>> there is no device associated with the module, this is one of two patches
>> that resolves the module autoloading. This patch adds a module alias that
>> will associate the tegra20-cpufreq kernel module with the platform device,
>> other patch will instantiate the actual platform device. And now it makes
>> sense to wrap cpufreq driver into a platform driver for consistency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
>> index c0a7b5a78aa6..f9d02a28df9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> -#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>
>> static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>> { .frequency = 216000 },
>> @@ -33,15 +33,19 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>> { .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
>> };
>>
>> -static struct clk *cpu_clk;
>> -static struct clk *pll_x_clk;
>> -static struct clk *pll_p_clk;
>> -static bool pll_x_prepared;
>> +struct tegra20_cpufreq_data {
>
> Nit: I'm not a big fan of _data suffixes because they are completely
> redundant. Any data structure by definition hosts data, so I'd just drop
> that.
Okay, I'll drop it in v2.
> [...]
>> @@ -152,55 +161,76 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver tegra_cpufreq_driver = {
>> .suspend = cpufreq_generic_suspend,
>> };
>>
>> -static int __init tegra_cpufreq_init(void)
>> +static int tegra20_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + struct tegra20_cpufreq_data *data;
>> int err;
>>
>> - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra20"))
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - cpu_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "cclk");
>> - if (IS_ERR(cpu_clk))
>> - return PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
>> + data->cpu_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "cclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->cpu_clk))
>> + return PTR_ERR(data->cpu_clk);
>>
>> - pll_x_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "pll_x");
>> - if (IS_ERR(pll_x_clk)) {
>> - err = PTR_ERR(pll_x_clk);
>> + data->pll_x_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "pll_x");
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->pll_x_clk)) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(data->pll_x_clk);
>> goto put_cpu;
>> }
>>
>> - pll_p_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "pll_p");
>> - if (IS_ERR(pll_p_clk)) {
>> - err = PTR_ERR(pll_p_clk);
>> + data->pll_p_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "pll_p");
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->pll_p_clk)) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(data->pll_p_clk);
>> goto put_pll_x;
>> }
>>
>> + data->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + tegra_cpufreq_driver.driver_data = data;
>
> Couldn't this be embedded into struct tegra20_cpufreq_data? Moving
> everything but this into a per-device data structure seems half-baked.
That's a good suggestions, thank you.
