On Fri, 18 May 2018 08:23:43 +0200 Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > * Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > x86: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation > > x86: kprobes: Ignore break_handler > > x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path > > So this is another annoyance. Do you ever compare the changelogs and titles > you > write with the ones I actually commit? They are almost never the same, for > example > the titles to x86 level kprobes code are always trying to use this kind of > prefix: > > b664d57f39d0: kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from jprobe handlers > ee213fc72fd6: kprobes/x86: Set up frame pointer in kprobe trampoline > a19b2e3d7839: kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from ftrace-based/optimized > kprobes > 5bb4fc2d8641: kprobes/x86: Disable preemption in ftrace-based jprobes > 9a09f261a4fa: kprobes/x86: Disable preemption in optprobe > cd52edad55fb: kprobes/x86: Move the get_kprobe_ctlblk() into irq-disabled > block > a8976fc84b64: kprobes/x86: Remove addressof() operators > > Not "x86: kprobes:" which is the wrong order anyway... OK, I got it. And sorry for the prefix change. > > Could you please be more careful about all this in the future? Yes, I promise it, use kprobes/x86: prefix for kprobes x86 part. Thank you, > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
