On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:27:15AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/18/18 00:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Ok, this is cool, it addresses the robustness problem that INT3 padding
> > introduced
> > very nicely.
> >
> > The concept of built-in kernel tooling working at the machine code level is
> > just
> > so powerful - we should have added our own KCC compiler 20 years ago.
> >
>
> How many times has this been suggested? ;)
Goes to show we still really need it. Imagine the simplifications and
improvements we'll be able to do. Oh myyy....
/me has a wet dream.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
