Hi Michal > I have earlier suggested that you split this into two parts. One to add > the missing information and the later to convert it to a single printk > output.
I'm sorry I do not get your point. What do you mean the missing information? > but it still really begs an example why we really insist on a single > printk and that should be in its own changelog. Actually , I just know that we should avoid the interleaving messages in the dmesg. But I don't know how to reproduce this issue. I think I can just recount this issue in the changelog. Thanks
