I found that glibc has already dealt with this case. So this issue must have been met before, should it be maintained by libc/user?
if (GLRO(dl_sysinfo_dso) == NULL) { kact.sa_flags |= SA_RESTORER; kact.sa_restorer = ((act->sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) ? &restore_rt : &restore); } On 2018/6/6 15:52, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > > > On 2018/6/5 19:24, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> After I executed "echo 0 > /proc/sys/abi/vsyscall32" to disable vdso, the >> rt_sigaction01 test case from ltp_2015 failed. >> The test case source code please refer to the attachment, and the output as >> blow: >> >> ----------------- >> ./rt_sigaction01 >> rt_sigaction01 0 TINFO : signal: 34 >> rt_sigaction01 1 TPASS : rt_sigaction call succeeded: result = 0 >> rt_sigaction01 0 TINFO : sa.sa_flags = SA_RESETHAND|SA_SIGINFO >> rt_sigaction01 0 TINFO : Signal Handler Called with signal number 34 >> >> Segmentation fault >> ------------------ >> >> >> Is this the desired result? In function ia32_setup_rt_frame, I found below >> code: >> >> if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER) >> restorer = ksig->ka.sa.sa_restorer; >> else >> restorer = current->mm->context.vdso + >> vdso_image_32.sym___kernel_rt_sigreturn; >> put_user_ex(ptr_to_compat(restorer), &frame->pretcode); >> >> Because the vdso is disabled, so current->mm->context.vdso is NULL, which >> cause the result of frame->pretcode invalid. >> >> I'm not sure whether this is a kernel bug or just an error of test case >> itself. Can anyone help me? >> > -- Thanks! BestRegards