Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Miguel Figueiredo: >> Hi all, >> >> some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found on >> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c > > Hi Miquel, Ingo, Con! > [...]
> Any suggestions? I read somewhere in the list that X itself makes lots of hocus pocus that affect the behavior of programs running inside X itself (i even read about X's own scheduling - someone can confirm/deny it? - and evil behavior on drivers). If we look/test a fair/responsive scheduler isn't better to test it outside X? IMHO, X itself, it's too complex and may obscure our tests on fairness/interactivity. Anyone knows any good tests for interctivity? [...] -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
